Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Rental income received by the appellant from sub-letting of the "Kantilal House" premises to Bank of Baroda - taxable either u/s.22 or u/s.56 - for the purpose of Sec. 27(iiib) r.w.s. 269UA(f)(i), the assessee was deemed owner of the property and therefore, the stated income was rightly brought to tax by revenue authorities as Income from House Property
Rental income received by the appellant from sub-letting of the "Kantilal House" premises to Bank of Baroda - taxable either u/s.22 or u/s.56 - for the purpose of Sec. 27(iiib) r.w.s. 269UA(f)(i), the assessee was deemed owner of the property and therefore, the stated income was rightly brought to tax by revenue authorities as Income from House Property
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
