Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
TDS u/s 194 - Since this Tribunal has already taken a view that the person to whom interest was paid was falling within the ambit of section 194A(3)(f), there cannot be any order treating the assessee as an assessee in default u/s. 201(1) and also levying interest u/s. 201(1A)
TDS u/s 194 - Since this Tribunal has already taken a view that the person to whom interest was paid was falling within the ambit of section 194A(3)(f), there cannot be any order treating the assessee as an assessee in default u/s. 201(1) and also levying interest u/s. 201(1A)
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
