Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Imposition of penalty - discrepancy in Form 38, E-Sugam form - the Officer managing the Check Post after verifying the goods should have filled up the Column 8 of Form 38 in accordance with the documents and there was no occasion for imposing a penalty as has been done by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the Commercial Tax Tribunal.
Imposition of penalty - discrepancy in Form 38, E-Sugam form - the Officer managing the Check Post after verifying the goods should have filled up the Column 8 of Form 38 in accordance with the documents and there was no occasion for imposing a penalty as has been done by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the Commercial Tax Tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
