Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Fraudulent income tax refunds - charge of conspiracy / connivance against the person claiming the refund and ITO - income tax officer, who is responsible for verification and process of Income tax returns came - Prosecution failed to prove against the ITO (Accused no. 9) but The evidence led on behalf of prosecution is consistent and sufficient to prove the ingredients of offence punishable under Section 120B of IPC, 420, 467, 498 and 471 r/w 120B of IPC against accused No.1 to 4 and 6 to 8.
Fraudulent income tax refunds - charge of conspiracy / connivance against the person claiming the refund and ITO - income tax officer, who is responsible for verification and process of Income tax returns came - Prosecution failed to prove against the ITO (Accused no. 9) but The evidence led on behalf of prosecution is consistent and sufficient to prove the ingredients of offence punishable under Section 120B of IPC, 420, 467, 498 and 471 r/w 120B of IPC against accused No.1 to 4 and 6 to 8.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.