Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Detention of Goods and vehicle - Sections 129 and 130 of GST Act have non-obstante clauses, whereby they can be operated upon in spite of Sections 73 and 74 of GST Act - The comparison of the provisions of Customs Act/ Excise Act on one hand and the provisions of the Act on the other, as sought to be drawn on behalf of the writ applicants, is not correct
Detention of Goods and vehicle - Sections 129 and 130 of GST Act have non-obstante clauses, whereby they can be operated upon in spite of Sections 73 and 74 of GST Act - The comparison of the provisions of Customs Act/ Excise Act on one hand and the provisions of the Act on the other, as sought to be drawn on behalf of the writ applicants, is not correct
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.