Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Applicability of MAT section 115JB to the assessee being a Banking Company - there is not a single decision of the Jurisdictional High Court or even of any other Hon’ble High Court which is in favour of the Revenue on this issue - the provision of section 115JB was not applicable in the case of the assessee being a Banking company for the year under consideration, i.e. A.Y. 2010-11
Applicability of MAT section 115JB to the assessee being a Banking Company - there is not a single decision of the Jurisdictional High Court or even of any other Hon’ble High Court which is in favour of the Revenue on this issue - the provision of section 115JB was not applicable in the case of the assessee being a Banking company for the year under consideration, i.e. A.Y. 2010-11
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.