Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Interpretation of statute - meaning of the expression ‘reason to believe’ and ‘liable to confiscation’ u/s 110 of the Customs Act, 1962 - import of prohibited goods - betel nuts - cut dried Areca Nuts (dark pink in colour) - There is no track record of past history of the instant petitioners - ‘reason to believe’ cannot be converted into a formalised procedural roadblock
Interpretation of statute - meaning of the expression ‘reason to believe’ and ‘liable to confiscation’ u/s 110 of the Customs Act, 1962 - import of prohibited goods - betel nuts - cut dried Areca Nuts (dark pink in colour) - There is no track record of past history of the instant petitioners - ‘reason to believe’ cannot be converted into a formalised procedural roadblock
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.