Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
The discretion exercised by the Objection Hearing Authority under Section 74 of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 while issuing direction for deposit of 5% of the amount can, by no stretch of imagination, be said to be illegal, unreasonable or excessive
The discretion exercised by the Objection Hearing Authority under Section 74 of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 while issuing direction for deposit of 5% of the amount can, by no stretch of imagination, be said to be illegal, unreasonable or excessive
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.