Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ex-parte assessment - In view of the inter se dispute between the assessee and the tax consultant or merely on the complaint made by the department against the tax consultant, the Revenue should not suffer. Hence, the assessments concluded by the prescribed authority – respondent No.2 subjecting the petitioner to tax liability cannot be faulted with.
Ex-parte assessment - In view of the inter se dispute between the assessee and the tax consultant or merely on the complaint made by the department against the tax consultant, the Revenue should not suffer. Hence, the assessments concluded by the prescribed authority – respondent No.2 subjecting the petitioner to tax liability cannot be faulted with.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.