Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
501 to 520 of 96363 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Rejection of declaration filed under the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016 (IDS) - payment of advance claimed to be adjusted - Admittedly, there was no regular assessment for the said year, whereby the said advance tax could have been adjusted. - Therefore, there is no logic or rationale in denying the petitioner credit of this amount while computing the amount payable by him under the IDS
Rejection of declaration filed under the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016 (IDS) - payment of advance claimed to be adjusted - Admittedly, there was no regular assessment for the said year, whereby the said advance tax could have been adjusted. - Therefore, there is no logic or rationale in denying the petitioner credit of this amount while computing the amount payable by him under the IDS
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.