Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
Service of order - Relevant date for communication of order - Period of limitation for filing an appeal - the appellant could able to demonstrate and rebut the presumption that the order dated 29.08.2017 could not have been delivered to them through the speed post dated 01.09.2017 and in fact they have not been communicated about the said Order on 12.9.2017 as held by the Ld. Commissioner(Appeals). - there is no delay in filing the appeal.
Service of order - Relevant date for communication of order - Period of limitation for filing an appeal - the appellant could able to demonstrate and rebut the presumption that the order dated 29.08.2017 could not have been delivered to them through the speed post dated 01.09.2017 and in fact they have not been communicated about the said Order on 12.9.2017 as held by the Ld. Commissioner(Appeals). - there is no delay in filing the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
