Customs valuation of used garments requires comparability proof, while restricted imports without a licence justify proportionate confiscation and pen...
Profiteering - Sanitary Napkin - Respondent No. 1 (manufacturer) had increased the base price w.e.f. 27.07.2019 more than what he was entitled to increase, which clearly shows that he had deliberately in conscious disregard of the provisions of Section 171 of the above Act had resorted to profiteering.
Profiteering - Sanitary Napkin - Respondent No. 1 (manufacturer) had increased the base price w.e.f. 27.07.2019 more than what he was entitled to increase, which clearly shows that he had deliberately in conscious disregard of the provisions of Section 171 of the above Act had resorted to profiteering.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
