Unregistered profit-sharing agreements cannot justify occupation of corporate debtor premises during CIRP; repossession by the Resolution Professional...
Seeking advance ruling by suppressing vital facts - Matter was already under investigation by the DGGI - There is a premeditated and a conscious action on the part of the applicant-respondent to undermine the process of the Advance Ruling and an attempt to use it to satisfy their own ends. We therefore hold that the order of the AAR is void ab-initio as it was vitiated by the process of suppression of material facts.
Seeking advance ruling by suppressing vital facts - Matter was already under investigation by the DGGI - There is a premeditated and a conscious action on the part of the applicant-respondent to undermine the process of the Advance Ruling and an attempt to use it to satisfy their own ends. We therefore hold that the order of the AAR is void ab-initio as it was vitiated by the process of suppression of material facts.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.