Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Refund claim - time limitation - Section 11B - The doctrine of merger applicable to the case on hand - the view of the respondent-revenue in denying the refund claimed by the appellant is unjustifiable and hit by Article 265 of the Constitution of India.
Refund claim - time limitation - Section 11B - The doctrine of merger applicable to the case on hand - the view of the respondent-revenue in denying the refund claimed by the appellant is unjustifiable and hit by Article 265 of the Constitution of India.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.