Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
The Commissioner had limited scope in the remand proceedings and could not have put the appellants in more precarious position then what was held against them in the earlier proceedings specifically when revenue had not filed any appeal against the earlier order.
The Commissioner had limited scope in the remand proceedings and could not have put the appellants in more precarious position then what was held against them in the earlier proceedings specifically when revenue had not filed any appeal against the earlier order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
