Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - difference in original return of income and revised return - Had it been the intention of the assessee to make a full and true disclosure of its income, it would have filed a revised return of income before the issuance of the notice 143(2)/ 142(1) by the AO. - Penalty confirmed.
Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - difference in original return of income and revised return - Had it been the intention of the assessee to make a full and true disclosure of its income, it would have filed a revised return of income before the issuance of the notice 143(2)/ 142(1) by the AO. - Penalty confirmed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
