Contingency expenses, exempt-income disallowance, and royalty benchmarking: unsupported adjustments were deleted under consistent accounting and trans...
Disciplinary proportionality requires penalties for Authorised Representative misconduct to match proven harm, leading to reconsideration of registrat...
Penalty u/s 271D and 271E - violation of Sections 269SS and 269T - repeated mistake - penalty for earlier years was dropped - Tribunal fell in error in upholding the imposition of penalty by just observing that the Assessee ought not have repeated such a mistake and ought to have done the transaction only through Bank - HC
Penalty u/s 271D and 271E - violation of Sections 269SS and 269T - repeated mistake - penalty for earlier years was dropped - Tribunal fell in error in upholding the imposition of penalty by just observing that the Assessee ought not have repeated such a mistake and ought to have done the transaction only through Bank - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4918 
