Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Insolvency and BankruptcySeptember 27, 2019Case LawsAT
Initiation of CIRP - Corporate Debtor unable to repay the amount - Non Performing Asset - Right of the Bank - In absence of any specific order of taking over the Management in terms of Section 13(4)(b) of the SARAFAESI Act, which includes the right to transfer by way of lease, assignment or sale for realizing of the secured asset, we hold that the Management of the ‘Corporate Debtor’ continued with the Promoter. Therefore, if there is any default on the part of the ‘Corporate Debtor’ to pay the debt amount, the Appellant cannot pass the blame on the Bank.
Initiation of CIRP - Corporate Debtor unable to repay the amount - Non Performing Asset - Right of the Bank - In absence of any specific order of taking over the Management in terms of Section 13(4)(b) of the SARAFAESI Act, which includes the right to transfer by way of lease, assignment or sale for realizing of the secured asset, we hold that the Management of the ‘Corporate Debtor’ continued with the Promoter. Therefore, if there is any default on the part of the ‘Corporate Debtor’ to pay the debt amount, the Appellant cannot pass the blame on the Bank.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
