PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
Penalty under u/s 271(1)(c) - period of limitation - as per the proviso to section 275(1)(a) of the Act, the penalty order ought to have been passed on or before 31.3.2005. i.e. within one year from the end of the financial year in which the Id. CIT(A)'s order was received back by the Department - penalty set aside - AT
Penalty under u/s 271(1)(c) - period of limitation - as per the proviso to section 275(1)(a) of the Act, the penalty order ought to have been passed on or before 31.3.2005. i.e. within one year from the end of the financial year in which the Id. CIT(A)'s order was received back by the Department - penalty set aside - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
