Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Rejection of application u/s 254(2) by the ITAT to re-call the order - order was passed ex-parte - non appearance of assessee - No litigant would stand benefited by not appearing before a court or tribunal or belatedly appearing before a court or tribunal - Ex-parte order set aside - HC
Rejection of application u/s 254(2) by the ITAT to re-call the order - order was passed ex-parte - non appearance of assessee - No litigant would stand benefited by not appearing before a court or tribunal or belatedly appearing before a court or tribunal - Ex-parte order set aside - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.