Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Rejection of application u/s 254(2) by the ITAT to re-call the order - order was passed ex-parte - non appearance of assessee - No litigant would stand benefited by not appearing before a court or tribunal or belatedly appearing before a court or tribunal - Ex-parte order set aside - HC
Rejection of application u/s 254(2) by the ITAT to re-call the order - order was passed ex-parte - non appearance of assessee - No litigant would stand benefited by not appearing before a court or tribunal or belatedly appearing before a court or tribunal - Ex-parte order set aside - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.