Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Capital asset u/s 2(14) - whether loan given to its subsidiary in India, by the foreign company constitute capital asset - Held Yes - Revenue has not been able to point out any reasons to understand meaning of the word ‘property’ as given in the Section 2(14) of the Act differently from the meaning given to it u/s 2(e) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957. - HC
Capital asset u/s 2(14) - whether loan given to its subsidiary in India, by the foreign company constitute capital asset - Held Yes - Revenue has not been able to point out any reasons to understand meaning of the word ‘property’ as given in the Section 2(14) of the Act differently from the meaning given to it u/s 2(e) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.