Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
Penalty u/s 158BFA(2) - period of limitation - relevant date - on the issue of additions, ITAT and HC decided the matter in favor of assessee whereas Supreme Court has finally decided the matter in favor of Revenue - The notice is well within six months from the date of the order of Hon'ble Supreme Court and therefore, it cannot be gainsaid that impugned order is barred by limitation - penalty upheld
Penalty u/s 158BFA(2) - period of limitation - relevant date - on the issue of additions, ITAT and HC decided the matter in favor of assessee whereas Supreme Court has finally decided the matter in favor of Revenue - The notice is well within six months from the date of the order of Hon'ble Supreme Court and therefore, it cannot be gainsaid that impugned order is barred by limitation - penalty upheld
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.