Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Disallowance of Employees’ Contribution to PF - inadvertently disallowed in the revised return despite remitted within the due dates - DRP brushed aside the assessee’s claim holding that in view of section 144C(1) the claim does not relate to any variation made by the AO - whatever may be the fetters placed on the scope of the powers of the DRP, there can be no estoppel against the application/operation of law laid by the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court - allowable
Disallowance of Employees’ Contribution to PF - inadvertently disallowed in the revised return despite remitted within the due dates - DRP brushed aside the assessee’s claim holding that in view of section 144C(1) the claim does not relate to any variation made by the AO - whatever may be the fetters placed on the scope of the powers of the DRP, there can be no estoppel against the application/operation of law laid by the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court - allowable
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
