Habeas corpus challenge to arrest safeguards remains maintainable, but substantial compliance with reasons-to-believe requirement defeats the petition...
Stay of demand - when Pr. CIT has not mechanically required the Petitioners to pay 20% of the total demand, but has used the discretion, and passed a reasoned order, determining the amount payable at around 14% of the total demand - no interference is called for
Stay of demand - when Pr. CIT has not mechanically required the Petitioners to pay 20% of the total demand, but has used the discretion, and passed a reasoned order, determining the amount payable at around 14% of the total demand - no interference is called for
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.