Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Stay of demand - when Pr. CIT has not mechanically required the Petitioners to pay 20% of the total demand, but has used the discretion, and passed a reasoned order, determining the amount payable at around 14% of the total demand - no interference is called for
Stay of demand - when Pr. CIT has not mechanically required the Petitioners to pay 20% of the total demand, but has used the discretion, and passed a reasoned order, determining the amount payable at around 14% of the total demand - no interference is called for
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.