Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Page of 4790
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 95794 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty u/s. 271E - period of limitation - There is no dispute that the period of limitation is required to be examined as per Section 275(1)(c) - it is futile to contend that the date of initiation of proceedings is the date on which the JCIT receives intimation from the AO or the date on which the JCIT issues SCN to the Assessee - AO having initiated the penalty proceedings in assessment order dated 24.3.2016 and imposed on 27.1.2017 - bared by limitation
Penalty u/s. 271E - period of limitation - There is no dispute that the period of limitation is required to be examined as per Section 275(1)(c) - it is futile to contend that the date of initiation of proceedings is the date on which the JCIT receives intimation from the AO or the date on which the JCIT issues SCN to the Assessee - AO having initiated the penalty proceedings in assessment order dated 24.3.2016 and imposed on 27.1.2017 - bared by limitation
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
