Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - while declining deduction u/s 80IA no defect was pointed out by the A.O. with regard to assessee’s eligibility save and except there was delay in filing return of income - raising a bona fide legal claim, even if it is ultimately found to be legally not acceptable, could not amount to concealing particulars of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income - no penalty
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - while declining deduction u/s 80IA no defect was pointed out by the A.O. with regard to assessee’s eligibility save and except there was delay in filing return of income - raising a bona fide legal claim, even if it is ultimately found to be legally not acceptable, could not amount to concealing particulars of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income - no penalty
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.