Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Penalty u/sec. 271B - assessee had entered into only a single transaction and has bonafide belief that the transaction entered into by her leads to capital gains and not business transaction AO consider the same as business income then it attracts the provisions of section 44AB - since explanation given by the assessee is bonafide and also justified, no penalty can be levied u/s 271B
Penalty u/sec. 271B - assessee had entered into only a single transaction and has bonafide belief that the transaction entered into by her leads to capital gains and not business transaction AO consider the same as business income then it attracts the provisions of section 44AB - since explanation given by the assessee is bonafide and also justified, no penalty can be levied u/s 271B
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.