Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Recovery of erroneously grant of Rebate claim - reliability on statements - procedure prescribed u/s 9D of Central Excise Act, 1944 is mandatory to follow - matter remanded back with respect to the statements and also consider any other additional evidence that may be produced by the appellants.
Recovery of erroneously grant of Rebate claim - reliability on statements - procedure prescribed u/s 9D of Central Excise Act, 1944 is mandatory to follow - matter remanded back with respect to the statements and also consider any other additional evidence that may be produced by the appellants.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.