Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Insolvency and BankruptcyAugust 1, 2019Case LawsAT
Admissibility of CIRP petition under I&B code - as per invoice buyer is ‘Perfect IT Solution’ and not ‘Sify Technologies Limited’ (Respondent herein) - a disputed question of fact can be decided by a Court of Competent Jurisdiction and not by the Adjudicating Authority or by this Appellate Tribunal, hence the application u/s 9 is not maintainable
Admissibility of CIRP petition under I&B code - as per invoice buyer is ‘Perfect IT Solution’ and not ‘Sify Technologies Limited’ (Respondent herein) - a disputed question of fact can be decided by a Court of Competent Jurisdiction and not by the Adjudicating Authority or by this Appellate Tribunal, hence the application u/s 9 is not maintainable
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.