Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Insolvency and BankruptcyAugust 1, 2019Case LawsAT
Admissibility of CIRP petition under I&B code - as per invoice buyer is ‘Perfect IT Solution’ and not ‘Sify Technologies Limited’ (Respondent herein) - a disputed question of fact can be decided by a Court of Competent Jurisdiction and not by the Adjudicating Authority or by this Appellate Tribunal, hence the application u/s 9 is not maintainable
Admissibility of CIRP petition under I&B code - as per invoice buyer is ‘Perfect IT Solution’ and not ‘Sify Technologies Limited’ (Respondent herein) - a disputed question of fact can be decided by a Court of Competent Jurisdiction and not by the Adjudicating Authority or by this Appellate Tribunal, hence the application u/s 9 is not maintainable
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
