Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Non-speaking order - ex-parte order- impugned order does not mention even a single ground/grievance urged by the Appellants in their memos of appeals before it even if on similar fact Tribunal had cancelled the revocation of a Customs House Agents License which was even brought to notice - in the absence of the grievance of the parties before it being considered, the impugned order is a nonspeaking order - remanded for reconsideration
Non-speaking order - ex-parte order- impugned order does not mention even a single ground/grievance urged by the Appellants in their memos of appeals before it even if on similar fact Tribunal had cancelled the revocation of a Customs House Agents License which was even brought to notice - in the absence of the grievance of the parties before it being considered, the impugned order is a nonspeaking order - remanded for reconsideration
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.