Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Rectification u/s 254 - violation of the provisions of section 255(3) - appeal heard by a Single Member Bench instead of Division Bench - since the income assessed in the hands of assessee was more than ₹ 50 lakhs, the appeal ought not to have been heard by a Single Member Bench - order suffers from a mistake apparent on the face of record - recalled
Rectification u/s 254 - violation of the provisions of section 255(3) - appeal heard by a Single Member Bench instead of Division Bench - since the income assessed in the hands of assessee was more than ₹ 50 lakhs, the appeal ought not to have been heard by a Single Member Bench - order suffers from a mistake apparent on the face of record - recalled
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
