Habeas corpus challenge to arrest safeguards remains maintainable, but substantial compliance with reasons-to-believe requirement defeats the petition...
Rejection of Refund to the Petitioner on the basis of ‘zero demand orders’ - There is no purpose served in passing such ‘zero demand’ orders as they end up only multiplying litigation needlessly and delaying the grant of refunds to which the dealers are legitimately entitled.
Rejection of Refund to the Petitioner on the basis of ‘zero demand orders’ - There is no purpose served in passing such ‘zero demand’ orders as they end up only multiplying litigation needlessly and delaying the grant of refunds to which the dealers are legitimately entitled.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.