Unregistered profit-sharing agreements cannot justify occupation of corporate debtor premises during CIRP; repossession by the Resolution Professional...
Rejection of Refund to the Petitioner on the basis of ‘zero demand orders’ - There is no purpose served in passing such ‘zero demand’ orders as they end up only multiplying litigation needlessly and delaying the grant of refunds to which the dealers are legitimately entitled.
Rejection of Refund to the Petitioner on the basis of ‘zero demand orders’ - There is no purpose served in passing such ‘zero demand’ orders as they end up only multiplying litigation needlessly and delaying the grant of refunds to which the dealers are legitimately entitled.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
