Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Franchise Service or not - sharing of profit - the agreement between the appellant and the licensee/dealer is in nature of share of profit in the ratio of 25% and 75% and in cases where there is a loss, the appellant does not received any amount towards the activity - not taxable under the category of ‘Franchise Service’
Franchise Service or not - sharing of profit - the agreement between the appellant and the licensee/dealer is in nature of share of profit in the ratio of 25% and 75% and in cases where there is a loss, the appellant does not received any amount towards the activity - not taxable under the category of ‘Franchise Service’
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.