Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Bogus LTCG - addition u/s 68 - exemption of LTCG u/s 10(38) - penny stock - neither the assessee nor his broker are named as illegitimate beneficiary to bogus LTCG in any of the alleged statements of the operators/brokers or reports/orders of SEBI or INV wing - AO has also failed to produce any material/evidence to dislodge or controvert the genuineness of the conclusive documentary evidences - no addition
Bogus LTCG - addition u/s 68 - exemption of LTCG u/s 10(38) - penny stock - neither the assessee nor his broker are named as illegitimate beneficiary to bogus LTCG in any of the alleged statements of the operators/brokers or reports/orders of SEBI or INV wing - AO has also failed to produce any material/evidence to dislodge or controvert the genuineness of the conclusive documentary evidences - no addition
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.