Unregistered profit-sharing agreements cannot justify occupation of corporate debtor premises during CIRP; repossession by the Resolution Professional...
Page of 4824
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2981 to 3000 of 96463 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Applicability of Rule 8(3A) of the CER, 2002 - prospective or retrospective - the rule is substantive in character since it relates to payment terms regarding duty and the effects of default in payment thereof and it is not at all procedural - only prospective operation - nothing in the said Rule suggest that it would have retrospective effect
Applicability of Rule 8(3A) of the CER, 2002 - prospective or retrospective - the rule is substantive in character since it relates to payment terms regarding duty and the effects of default in payment thereof and it is not at all procedural - only prospective operation - nothing in the said Rule suggest that it would have retrospective effect
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
