Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Revision u/s 263 - Deduction U/s. 35D - effect of omission of word ‘industrial’ by the Finance Act, 2008 w.e.f 1/04/2009 - expenses incurred prior to 1/04/2009 - since assessee has fulfilled all the conditions stipulated under the Act for the residual period, there is no error in the order of the Ld. AO granting deduction - CIT is not right in his rem to invoke the revision provisions
Revision u/s 263 - Deduction U/s. 35D - effect of omission of word ‘industrial’ by the Finance Act, 2008 w.e.f 1/04/2009 - expenses incurred prior to 1/04/2009 - since assessee has fulfilled all the conditions stipulated under the Act for the residual period, there is no error in the order of the Ld. AO granting deduction - CIT is not right in his rem to invoke the revision provisions
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
