Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Revision u/s 263 - Deduction U/s. 35D - effect of omission of word ‘industrial’ by the Finance Act, 2008 w.e.f 1/04/2009 - expenses incurred prior to 1/04/2009 - since assessee has fulfilled all the conditions stipulated under the Act for the residual period, there is no error in the order of the Ld. AO granting deduction - CIT is not right in his rem to invoke the revision provisions
Revision u/s 263 - Deduction U/s. 35D - effect of omission of word ‘industrial’ by the Finance Act, 2008 w.e.f 1/04/2009 - expenses incurred prior to 1/04/2009 - since assessee has fulfilled all the conditions stipulated under the Act for the residual period, there is no error in the order of the Ld. AO granting deduction - CIT is not right in his rem to invoke the revision provisions
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
