Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Revision u/s 263 - the sole reason for completing the scrutiny assessment was suspicious LTCG earned by assessee based on information received from Investigation Wing, it could not be believed that A.O. would not have gone through the material available - non discussion the details in the assessment order would not give right to the Ld. Pr. CIT to hold that no investigation or enquiry was made - A.O. has taken one of permissible view - no revision
Revision u/s 263 - the sole reason for completing the scrutiny assessment was suspicious LTCG earned by assessee based on information received from Investigation Wing, it could not be believed that A.O. would not have gone through the material available - non discussion the details in the assessment order would not give right to the Ld. Pr. CIT to hold that no investigation or enquiry was made - A.O. has taken one of permissible view - no revision
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.