Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Revision u/s 263 - the sole reason for completing the scrutiny assessment was suspicious LTCG earned by assessee based on information received from Investigation Wing, it could not be believed that A.O. would not have gone through the material available - non discussion the details in the assessment order would not give right to the Ld. Pr. CIT to hold that no investigation or enquiry was made - A.O. has taken one of permissible view - no revision
Revision u/s 263 - the sole reason for completing the scrutiny assessment was suspicious LTCG earned by assessee based on information received from Investigation Wing, it could not be believed that A.O. would not have gone through the material available - non discussion the details in the assessment order would not give right to the Ld. Pr. CIT to hold that no investigation or enquiry was made - A.O. has taken one of permissible view - no revision
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.