Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Revision u/s 263 - change of opinion - in proceedings u/s 147 assessee contended that the transfer price was based on the individual assets and liabilities of the undertaking transferred and the sale would not qualify as “Slump Sale” as per Section 2(42C) - this explanation of the Assessee was accepted by the AO - for the very same reasons, the CIT has invoked the power u/s 263 - not permissible
Revision u/s 263 - change of opinion - in proceedings u/s 147 assessee contended that the transfer price was based on the individual assets and liabilities of the undertaking transferred and the sale would not qualify as “Slump Sale” as per Section 2(42C) - this explanation of the Assessee was accepted by the AO - for the very same reasons, the CIT has invoked the power u/s 263 - not permissible
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
