Equivalent value attachment under money laundering law upheld where received funds were treated as proceeds of crime and prior-acquired property could...
Revision u/s 263 - change of opinion - in proceedings u/s 147 assessee contended that the transfer price was based on the individual assets and liabilities of the undertaking transferred and the sale would not qualify as “Slump Sale” as per Section 2(42C) - this explanation of the Assessee was accepted by the AO - for the very same reasons, the CIT has invoked the power u/s 263 - not permissible
Revision u/s 263 - change of opinion - in proceedings u/s 147 assessee contended that the transfer price was based on the individual assets and liabilities of the undertaking transferred and the sale would not qualify as “Slump Sale” as per Section 2(42C) - this explanation of the Assessee was accepted by the AO - for the very same reasons, the CIT has invoked the power u/s 263 - not permissible
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
