Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Revision u/s 263 - change of opinion - in proceedings u/s 147 assessee contended that the transfer price was based on the individual assets and liabilities of the undertaking transferred and the sale would not qualify as “Slump Sale” as per Section 2(42C) - this explanation of the Assessee was accepted by the AO - for the very same reasons, the CIT has invoked the power u/s 263 - not permissible
Revision u/s 263 - change of opinion - in proceedings u/s 147 assessee contended that the transfer price was based on the individual assets and liabilities of the undertaking transferred and the sale would not qualify as “Slump Sale” as per Section 2(42C) - this explanation of the Assessee was accepted by the AO - for the very same reasons, the CIT has invoked the power u/s 263 - not permissible
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
