Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Rectification u/s 254 - assessee claimed that contract were not forward contracts by virtue of proviso clauses (a)&(b) to Section 43(5) - the earlier portion of the main impugned order specifically noticed the compilation of documents produced during the proceedings, which contained specific contracts and the transactions which the Revenue alleged were speculative - remanded to consider the contentions
Rectification u/s 254 - assessee claimed that contract were not forward contracts by virtue of proviso clauses (a)&(b) to Section 43(5) - the earlier portion of the main impugned order specifically noticed the compilation of documents produced during the proceedings, which contained specific contracts and the transactions which the Revenue alleged were speculative - remanded to consider the contentions
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
