Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Exemption u/s 10(23C)(vi) - there has been no exercise done by the Department either at first instance or at least on review petition to find out as to whether the Trust has generated a reasonable surplus to enable them to sustain the institution and in the event of a higher surplus, whether they had ploughed back or utilising the same for achieving the objects of the trust - rejection invalid - remanded to CCIT
Exemption u/s 10(23C)(vi) - there has been no exercise done by the Department either at first instance or at least on review petition to find out as to whether the Trust has generated a reasonable surplus to enable them to sustain the institution and in the event of a higher surplus, whether they had ploughed back or utilising the same for achieving the objects of the trust - rejection invalid - remanded to CCIT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.