Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Reassessment notice u/s 148 - in pursuant to notice u/s 142(1), petitioner had furnished complete details with various documentary evidence and case was discussed by the ITO - It cannot be said that the tangible material which is said to have come to the notice of the AO was not taken into consideration and the income chargeable to tax have escaped assessment - reopening on the basis of the very same material, is change of opinion - notice quashed
Reassessment notice u/s 148 - in pursuant to notice u/s 142(1), petitioner had furnished complete details with various documentary evidence and case was discussed by the ITO - It cannot be said that the tangible material which is said to have come to the notice of the AO was not taken into consideration and the income chargeable to tax have escaped assessment - reopening on the basis of the very same material, is change of opinion - notice quashed
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.