Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Deduction u/s 54F - claim made for the first time before the CIT(A) - the appellate authority has power to consider a claim not made in the return and deduction u/s 54F was duly allowable where the property was purchased in the name of the wife of the assessee
Deduction u/s 54F - claim made for the first time before the CIT(A) - the appellate authority has power to consider a claim not made in the return and deduction u/s 54F was duly allowable where the property was purchased in the name of the wife of the assessee
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
